Apple Tested a Pencil for the Foldable iPhone Ultra – Here’s What We Learned
Apple’s internal tests show a shorter, magnetic‑charging Pencil built for the foldable iPhone Ultra—yet the company is likely to scrap it. Here’s the technical deep‑dive.
Apple’s design labs are humming with prototypes, but not every concept makes it to market. In a surprising reveal, Bloomberg’s Mark Gurman disclosed that Apple has already built and tested a compact Apple Pencil tailored for the forthcoming foldable iPhone, rumored to be called the iPhone Ultra. While the accessory looks promising on paper, internal assessments suggest it will remain a laboratory curiosity.
Why a Pencil for a Foldable Phone?
When Steve Jobs introduced the original iPhone in 2007, he famously dismissed styluses as a relic of the past. The gesture stuck, and for nearly two decades Apple’s mobile lineup has been stylus‑free. The foldable form factor, however, reopens the conversation. A larger, flexible display can benefit from precision input for note‑taking, sketching, and UI navigation—use cases that the iPad ecosystem already serves with the Apple Pencil.
Design tweaks for a pocket‑friendly tool
According to Gurman’s Power On newsletter, the iPhone‑specific Pencil is “stubbier” than the iPad version, meaning Apple trimmed the barrel to fit comfortably in a pocket alongside a thinner, foldable chassis. The prototype also retains Apple’s signature magnetic attachment, but instead of the flat side of an iPad, it latches onto the side of the iPhone Ultra’s hinge region, allowing both charging and secure storage.
Technical trade‑offs
The shift from a full‑length stylus to a stubby version forces Apple to re‑engineer several components:
- Battery capacity: A shorter body leaves less room for the 0.5 Wh cell used in the iPad Pencil (2nd gen). Apple likely had to shrink the battery, potentially reducing charge‑time endurance.
- Pressure sensitivity: The iPad Pencil offers 4,096 pressure levels. Maintaining that granularity in a smaller chassis would require denser sensor arrays, a manufacturing challenge Apple may have deemed too risky for a first‑generation foldable accessory.
- Latency: Apple’s current stylus latency sits at 9 ms on the iPad Pro. The prototype would need to match that on a device whose display refreshes at 120 Hz—an engineering hurdle compounded by the hinge’s variable curvature.
Why Apple might pull the plug
Two plausible reasons emerge from the limited information:
- Form‑factor friction: The foldable iPhone’s thin profile leaves scant real‑estate for a side‑mounted magnetic ring without compromising structural integrity. Adding a charging coil could interfere with the hinge’s durability testing.
- Software integration: iPadOS has spent years refining Pencil APIs, from tilt‑aware drawing to handwriting recognition. iOS would need a comparable stack, and Apple may not see enough developer demand to justify the investment for a niche accessory.
Spec comparison: iPad Pencil (2nd gen) vs. iPhone Ultra prototype
| Feature | iPad Pencil (2nd gen) | iPhone Ultra Prototype |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 166 mm | Shorter (stubby) – exact length undisclosed |
| Weight | 20.7 g | Estimated lighter due to reduced length |
| Charging | Magnetic side‑charging on iPad | Magnetic side‑charging on iPhone Ultra hinge |
| Pressure Levels | 4,096 | Targeted same, but unconfirmed |
| Latency | 9 ms (120 Hz) | Goal: ≤9 ms on 120 Hz foldable display |
Impact on Apple’s ecosystem
If Apple had released the Pencil for the iPhone Ultra, it would have blurred the line between iPad and iPhone workflows, potentially encouraging more creators to adopt a single device for both consumption and production. However, the decision to hold back signals a strategic focus on perfecting the foldable hardware first, rather than diluting the user experience with an accessory that may feel like an afterthought.
Developers will likely continue to target the iPad Pencil for premium drawing apps, while the iPhone Ultra’s large, flexible screen may inspire new UI paradigms that rely on touch gestures rather than stylus input. Apple’s internal testing shows the company is weighing the cost‑benefit of extending its stylus ecosystem into a market segment that has historically resisted it.
Disclosure: Tech Tabloid may earn an affiliate commission from qualifying purchases through Amazon links on this page at no additional cost to you.